Connecticut Trial Court: Missing Dual Agency Consent Form Doesn’t Void Contract

gavel on top of contract

In the case of Bastarache v. Edgerton, a tri-level Connecticut Superior Court ruled on a pre-trail motion that the failure to attach a dual agency consent form to the written agreement for the purchase of a property did not invalidate the agreement under contract law. It was also ruled that the absence of the form did not violate the state’s real estate licensing laws or violate public policy. The court noted that in order to form a binding contract in Connecticut, it is essential that there is mutual understanding of the terms between the parties involved. The court concluded that the substance of the contract contained the minimal essential terms needed to be valid, regardless of the absence of the dual agency consent form. These essential terms included the identification of the parties, property, purchase price, and closing date.

Copyright: ARELLO registered. Condensed from ARELLO’S Boundaries magazine (2015 June)

Full article: Arello Boundaries Excerpt Conneticut June 2015

This blog/website is made available by CRES Insurance Services for educational purposes to give you general information and understanding of legal risks and insurance options, not to provide specific legal advice. This blog/website should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state. Claims examples are for illustrative purposes only. Read your policy for a complete description of what is covered and excluded.

Originally Published June 25, 2015

Category: ,

Read about the new iPhone iOS 13 per @InmanNews https://t.co/R27UAYtfG7 RT @InmanNews: Feature that prompts social network users to reconsider posting potentially offensive comments grew out of effort to combat…