Connecticut Trial Court: Missing Dual Agency Consent Form Doesn’t Void Contract

gavel on top of contract

In the case of Bastarache v. Edgerton, a tri-level Connecticut Superior Court ruled on a pre-trail motion that the failure to attach a dual agency consent form to the written agreement for the purchase of a property did not invalidate the agreement under contract law. It was also ruled that the absence of the form did not violate the state’s real estate licensing laws or violate public policy. The court noted that in order to form a binding contract in Connecticut, it is essential that there is mutual understanding of the terms between the parties involved. The court concluded that the substance of the contract contained the minimal essential terms needed to be valid, regardless of the absence of the dual agency consent form. These essential terms included the identification of the parties, property, purchase price, and closing date.

Copyright: ARELLO registered. Condensed from ARELLO’S Boundaries magazine (2015 June)

Full article: Arello Boundaries Excerpt Conneticut June 2015

This blog/website is made available by CRES Insurance Services for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of legal risks and insurance options, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that the blog/website should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

Category: ,

With a CRES E&O insurance policy you have a ClaimPrevent® Legal Hotline on call 7 days a week to help resolve prob… Want to pay less for your real estate E&O? This is how lower-risks agents save money and prevent claims too…